While the Swedish government plans the 'final solution' for 375 wolves, environmental protection icon Greta Thunberg has more important matters on her mind. After all, wolficide is not genocide - at least in the hierarchy of a climate activist's sensitivities.

An analysis of Greta Thunberg's rhetoric in her commentary on the COP29 summit in Azerbaijan. The article discusses the rhetorical fallacies in Greta's message and examines whether radicalization as a form of communication ensures the effectiveness of climate activist strategies. Does Western hypocrisy and the hosts' actions deserve only an emotional manifesto?